I had sometime back read an article by Vinayak Chatterjee of Feedback Ventures where he said let us define infrastructure first, before we build it.
I came across this document in Committee on Infrastructure’s website which attempts to do the same.
It first summarises definition of infrastructure from six different sources and then concludes what all is to be included:
(i) Electricity (including generation, transmission and distribution) and R&M of power stations,
(ii) Non-Conventional Energy (including wind energy and solar energy),
(iii) Water supply and sanitation (including solid waste management, drainage and sewerage) and street lighting,
(iv) Telecommunications,
(v) Road & bridges,
(vi) Ports,
(vii) Inland waterways,
(viii) Airports,
(ix) Railways (including rolling stock and mass transit system),
(x) Irrigation (including watershed development),
(xi) Storage,
(xii) Oil and gas pipeline networks.
And what all it does not include which other sources include (from the table on last page):
- Housing
- Urban services; as street lighting, Solid Waste Management (SWM)
- Mining
- Aircrafts
- Vehicles, trucks, buses etc.(Road Transport System)
- Industrial Park/SEZ
- Educational Institutions
- Hospitals
- Posts
July 1, 2008 at 8:47 pm
[…] They mentioned some of the key politicians who are pushing the issue, and also mentioned a nice definition of infrastructure from Mostly […]
November 6, 2022 at 2:31 am
[…] Mostly Economics began a definition of infrastructure from one point of view which seemed pertinent. I am sure there are better, but this is a start. […]