FinMin Rupee Symbol Design Contest Update

I had posted about this contest by Finance Ministry of India to design a symbol for Indian Rupee (like $ for US Dollar etc). I got a lot of comments and designs on the post. Some were concerned over the status of the contest.

Fin Min has released a press release on the status of the contest. It says it has received many applications and a first list of short-listed entries would be posted on the website very soon.

Great news.


The first list of short-listed candidates is out and is here.

42 Responses to “FinMin Rupee Symbol Design Contest Update”

  1. Design symbol for Indian Rupee and send it to India Fin Min « Mostly Economics Says:

    […] Fin Min has released an update on the […]

  2. jayadev Says:

    Thanks Mr Agarwal, This is good news indeed


  3. KAY SHIV Says:

    But, why no trace of it on the Ministry website?

  4. Amol Agrawal Says:

    There is a mention on the home page. In the Recent Updates box on the homepage, the third link is an update on the contest. The links come one at a time so you have to wait

  5. irfandy Says:

    nice artikel and plz visit my blog

  6. irfandy Says:

    nice artikel, nice info friend, plz visit back to my blog

  7. johnny Says:

    Hello. Thank you for this great info! Keep up the good job!

  8. FinMin Rupee Symbol Design Contest Update « Mostly Economics < IndiaNewsBox Market Buzz – What's India Talking About Says:

    […] See the rest here: FinMin Rupee Symbol Design Contest Update « Mostly Economics […]

  9. KAY SHIV Says:

    Fine, but that seems to be a late correction carried out by the Ministry – but that too clumsily done. Moreover, mention in the Updates-scroll-window is a temporary measure which may vanish anytime (Does ‘Recent Updates’ has archives?). Otherwise, the main circular doesn’t have a hyperlink for it on the home page even now, as pointed out by many in their comments on this topic in your blog. And one drew a blank on entering ‘’ although suggested in the very circular on the ‘Symbol Competition’. I am subject to correction, and will be happy.

  10. Yasmin Says:

    I happened to accidentally bump into your blog and got interested in the Rupee Symbol thing going on. From the string of comments and after a visit to the Finmin website I have reason to believe that the Finance Ministry is not very professional (mired in babudom not well tuned to IT technology?) in dealing with such a matter – which in its own right is of great significance and consequence. As pointed out by Kay Shiv proper mention of the Symbol Competition is missing in the website – how careless? Even four months after the closing date they are yet to come out with the list of the entries which are in order in the first place. So long for just the preliminary scrutiny? Does that mean that there is no well oiled system in place or a special cell for the purpose, and things are taken very casually? Hope will be proved wrong and things improve.

  11. nkhil sharma Says:

    i believe it would be better to file an RTI application regarding the same. that will make those babus move a bit.what say friends? please comment

  12. Yasmin Says:

    Now, can you locate the Rupee symbol thing on the finmin website, Amolji?

  13. KAY SHIV Says:

    At last the first list of eligible applicants for the competition has been hosted on the Ministry website on 1st September 2009 as an hyperlink to the ‘update’ which ran for some time since 24.7.09 (the same has reappeared without the date) under “RECENT UPDATES”. This first list has nearly 3000 applicants. more are expected in subsequent list(s).

  14. First list of FinMin Rupee Design Contest « Mostly Economics Says:

    […] list of FinMin Rupee Design Contest By Amol Agrawal Kay Shiv points on the Fin Min Rupee Design Contest post that first list of shortlisted candidates has been put up today. The list is here and has 2455 […]

  15. KAY SHIV Says:

    Rest of the applicants’ list is also out, as second and third links in the ‘Competition for design of the -Symbol for Indian Rupee’ already running in the ‘Recent Updates” scroll in the Finmin website – now it is complete. Strangely, this is not easily noticeable because, the links have appeared subsequently in the same matter running since Sept 1- without carrying a date, in that sense without reflecting actual updating. Anyhow, hope things pick up speed now, towards Rupee symbol appearing on the scene.

  16. rakesh kumar singh Says:

    Shri Hitesh Padmashali 1152
    Shri Shahrukh J. Irani 523
    Shri D. Udaya Kumar 656
    Ms. Nondita Correa-Mehrotra 1647
    Shri Shibin K.K. 1476

  17. Nirmal Sarteja Says:

    When will be the result of final Selection of Symbol ?

  18. Amol Agrawal Says:

    Hi Sarteja,

    I dont know when the final results of selection of symbol be announced. There have been no pre-announcements of the dates for selection.

  19. raju Says:

    कृपया बी एस रावत जी से
    पूछे ———–
    २- जूरी के सामने समस्त २६४४ प्रतिभागियो का बायोडाटा भेजा गया की नहीं? अखिल भारतीय पारीछा मे बायोडाटा नहीं भेजा जाता जैसे – यू .पी.एस.सी. और लोक सेवा आयोग, कर्मचारी चयन आयोग आदि.
    ३- जूरी के केवल दो सदस्य आर्ट फील्ड से है अन्य पाँच सदस्य आर्ट फील्ड से है या नहीं ?
    ४- Nondita Correa-Mehrotra ने २००५ मे सिम्बोल हेतु आर .बी.आई /गवर्नमेंट को लिखा था, इसकी जानकारी को बी एस रावत जी ने छिपाया की नहीं (भारत दक्षिण-एशियाई क्षेत्र में मुक्त व्यापार लागू करने के बाद एक ही मुद्रा का प्रचलन शुरू करना चाहता है-नवभारत टाइम्स)
    ५- जूरी का नाम आज तक प्रकाशित नहीं किये जाने का क्या कारन हैं ?
    ६- अन्नंतिम पाँच लोगो का नाम प्रकाशित करने के पहले मंत्री/कैबिनेट का
    अनुमोदन लिया गया या नहीं? “RBI has given its recommendations, but it will need the approval of the finance minister as well as the Cabinet.
    ७- जूरी ने अंतिम एक प्रतिभागी की recommendations (संस्तुति) भी कर दी की नहीं?
    ८- aswidely accepted across the the country. के लिए कौन सी टेक्निक अपनाई जाएगी ?
    ९- shortlisted candidates said the symbols suggested were a mix of the traditional Indian script and the Roman script. इसका क्या अर्थ है- जूरी के सात सदस्य Indian National Language अन्तेर्गत सभी भाषा के जानकर थे या ट्रांसलेटर का सहारा लिया गया सभी के स्क्रिप्ट translate का प्रकासन किया जाये.

  20. b tiwari Says:
    “I had written to the RBI in 2005 saying we should have a symbol for the rupee,” said Nondita Correa-Mehrotra , one of the finalists, more marvelling at the coincidence of it all than implying it may have influenced the government.


  21. prmila Says:

    ——–I had written to the RBI in 2005 saying we should have a symbol for the rupee,” said Nondita Correa-Mehrotra , one of the finalists, more marvelling at the coincidence of it all than implying it may have influenced the government.

    Correa-Mehtorta is a Harvard University-trained architect and works at her father’s firm—Mumbai-based Charles Correa Associates. The final list pits two leading advertising agencies against each other for the big honour—JWT and Publicis Ambience.

    Hitesh Padamshali is a creative director, design, at JWT’s Mumbai office, while Shahrukh J Irani is a creative director at Publicis Ambience. The list also has a typography scholar in D. Udaya Kumar, a PhD candidate at IIT Mumbai’s Industrial Design Centre. He is preparing to defend his dissertation—Transformation of Tamil letter forms from palm leaf manuscripts to early letter press printing—early next year.

    Shibin KK, a computer science teacher at a government higher secondary school near Thalasserry, Kerala, is the fifth finalist, and an outsider of sorts with no formal training in drawing or design. However, he takes up freelance design work.

    For the five finalists, it’s a agonising wait till the symbol is unveiled.

  22. kakey Says:
    डॉलर और पाउंड की तर्ज पर अगर आपको रुपये के भी किसी प्रतीक चिह्न का इंतजार है, तो बस मार्च तक और घड़ियां गिनिए। मार्च में रुपये को चिह्न मिल जाएगा।

    भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक की डिप्टी गवर्नर उषा थोराट की अध्यक्षता वाली एक समिति ने करीब 4,000 प्रविष्टियों में से पांच को रुपये का निशान बनाने के लिए छांटा है। इनमें से किसी एक के डिजाइन पर ही अंतिम मुहर लगेगी और विजेता के नाम का ऐलान जनवरी में कर दिया जाएगा लेकिन वित्त मंत्रालय के सूत्रों के मुताबिक मार्च से पहले तक प्रक्रिया पूरी नहीं हो पाएगी।

    वित्त मंत्रालय के एक वरिष्ठ अधिकारी का कहना है, ‘आरबीआई ने अपनी सिफारिशें सौंप दी हैं लेकिन अभी इस पर वित्त मंत्रालय के साथ-साथ कैबिनेट की मुहर लगना बाकी है। इस प्रक्रिया में दो से तीन महीने का वक्त लग सकता है।’——————

  23. kakey Says:

    Information under RTI Act, 2005
    Given by Shr Sushil Kumar, Under Secretary to the Govt. of India & CPIO—–F.No. 3/40/09-Cy Dated 7th January, 2010

    Que. 1 Name, Professian & Home State of all the member of jury
    (i) Smt. Usha Thorat, Deputy Governor, RBI, Mumbai-Chairman.
    (ii) Shri K.V. Eapen, Joint Secretary, Deptt. of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.
    (iii) Ms. T. Kumar, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Culture, New Delhi.
    (iv) Smt. Aditi Mehta, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Culture, New Delhi.
    (v)Shri Anil Sinha, Chairperson, Integrated Desgin Services and Industry Programmes & Projects, National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad.
    (vi) Professor Hemant Nagdive, Director, JJ School of Arts, Mumbai.
    (vii) Shri Bazil Shaikh, Chief General Manager, RBI, Mumbai.

    Que. 2-How meny desins received in hindi/English & other languages out of eligible 2644 designs.

    Ans -The Designs do not have any Language, it is the shape (Drawing) only.
    Que. 3-How meny meetings when , where & each date of meeting, time taken for the meeting & average time of applicant design taken reg. Totat entries of evaluation ?

    Ans. Meetings of Jury were held on 29/30 September, 2009 in Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, New Delhi and on 16th November, 2009 in Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi for evaluation of entries. The meetings on 29th and 30th September were from 10.00AM to 5.00PM and the meeting meeting on 16th November was from 2-00 PM to 5.00PM

    Que. 4- Total received deigns and total of rejects deigns?
    Ans. There are 3331 eligible entries out of which five final entries were selected by the jury.
    Que. 7- The script of applicant which in Hindi language be translate in other language presents before jury.
    Ans. Only symbol of the applicant was presented to the Jury for selection.
    Que. 10- Explain briefly the rule (hindi-MANAK) of as widely accepting across the INDIA.
    Ans. The criteria adopted by the Jury in selecting the symbol was that the symbol should represent the historical and cultural ethos of the country as widely accepted across the Country and that the symbol has to be in the Indian National Language script or a visual representation. The second stage of selection focused on finer details such as whether the symbol
    (i) is distinct;
    (ii)can evoke a ready recall in India as well as internationally;
    (iii) is not unduly cluttered, i.e. simplicity;
    (iv) has strength of design;
    (v) is easy to write and typecast; and
    (vi) has integrity, unity of form and compact look
    Que. 11-The Biodata of eligible design put-up before jury or Coding Procedure in applied?
    Ans. Coding procedure was adopted.
    My e mail-

  24. rakesh Says:

    dear all. Pl correct jury meember (iv) department name (a am sory type mistake)

    (iv) Smt. Aditi Mehta, Joint Secretary,Indira gandhi national centre for arts, New Delhi.

  25. BalaShankar Says:

    Honestly, I am very much disappointed that my design could not make it to the top five. But my hearty congratulations to all the finalists.
    Eager to see the date when Indian currency would float its own symbol along with smiling Gandhi.

  26. mans Says:

    Initially eligible entry number 1138 was hold by Mitlesh kothari according to 1st list created on 26 August, 2009 and uploaded on Ministry of Finance website but now according to latest updated list which was created on 15 sep. 2009 his name is deleted.

  27. jayadev Says:

    can someone have the drafts designs using RTI

  28. jayadev Says:

    Since India is democratic, selection process should have been made after a public poll through internet / visual and print media

  29. rakesh Says:
  30. rakesh Says:

    जय हिंद,
    श्री सुशील कुमार, अवर सचिव भारत सरकार एवम सी.पी.आई.ओ. ने आर0टी0आई0 एक्ट २००५ के उन्तर्गत लेटर संख्या यफ.स. ३/४०/२००९-करेंसी दिनाक ०८ फरवरी, २०१० द्वारा निम्नानुसार सूचना दी गयी :-
    प्रश्न १- फ़ाइनल ५ के प्रत्येक अभ्यर्थियों का जूरी के सम्मुख प्रजेंटेसन किन- किन तिथियो मे कहाँ-कहाँ हुआ तथा प्रत्येक अभ्यर्थी/टीम ग्रुप द्वारा अपने-अपने सिम्बल को प्रजेंट करने मे कितना-कितना समय का उपयोग किया गया.
    उत्तर- फ़ाइनल ५ के अभ्यर्थियों का प्रजेंटेसन १५-12-२००९ को जूरी के सम्मुख हुआ. प्रत्येक अभ्यर्थी को प्रजेंटेसन के लिए (मोखिक रूप से) १०-१० मिनट का समय दिया गया है.
    प्रश्न २- क्या प्रत्येक प्रजेंटेसन की वीडियोग्राफी करायी गयी.
    उत्तर- नहीं.
    प्रश्न 3- जूरी के सम्मुख कुल ३३३१ डिजाइनो को प्रस्तुत की गयी किन्तु मंत्रालय के वेबसाईट मे २६४४ के लिस्ट प्रकाशित की गयी. इसका क्या कारण है.
    उत्तर- वेबसाईट मे केवल सभी शर्ते पूर्ण करने वाली प्राविस्थिया भेजने वाले अभ्यर्थियों के नाम दिए गए है. किसी-किसी अभ्यर्थी ने दो-दो डिजाइन भी दिए थे.
    प्रश्न 4- जिन अभ्यर्थियों की डिजाइन अपूर्ण थी क्या उनको कतिपय सुधार हेतु सूचित किया गया. एसे अभ्यर्थियों की संख्या.
    उत्तर- डिजाइन को पूर्ण करने के लिए या सुधार करने के लिए किसी को नहीं कहा गया.
    प्रश्न 5- कितने डिजाइनर के मूल डिजाइन (बायोडाटा, स्क्रिप्ट व डिमांड ड्राफ्ट) उनको वापस किया गया तथा कितने ऐसे डिजाइनर है जिन्होंने त्रुटि को सुधार कर मंत्रालय को भेजा.
    उत्तर- मूल डिजाइन (बायोडाटा, स्क्रिप्ट व डिमांड ड्राफ्ट सहित) जो कि निर्धारित अवधि मे प्राप्त हो गए थे, वापिस नहीं भेजे.
    प्रश्न ६- क्या फ़ाइनल ५ के अभ्यर्थियों मे से किसी ने दो डिजाइन से अधिक डिजाइन प्रेषित की थी.
    उत्तर- नहीं.
    प्रश्न 7- वित्त मंत्रालय की वेबसाईट पर तीन किश्तों मे प्रकाशित २६४४ डिजाइनो के अतिरिक्त ६८७ डिजाइनो के सूची क्यों नहीं प्रकाशित की गयी.
    उत्तर- २६४४ डिजाइन नहीं है, वह तो अभ्यर्थियों के नाम है.
    प्रश्न ८- कुल अर्ह ३३३१ डिजाइनो के स्क्रिप्ट किन-किन भाषाओ मे प्राप्त हुई तथा उनकी भाषावार संख्या.
    उत्तर- डिजाइन की कोई भाषा नहीं होती. स्क्रिप्ट हिंदी. अंगरेजी, तेलगू, मलयालम आदि भाषाओ मे प्राप्त हुई.
    प्रश्न 9- शासनादेश/गाइडलाइन मे उल्लिखित “इंडियन नॅशनल लान्ग्वेग” उन्तर्गत वित्त मंत्रालय की नजर मे कौन-कौन सी भाषाए है.
    उत्तर- संविधान द्वारा मान्यता प्राप्त सभी भाषाए.
    प्रश्न 10- भारतीय रूपये के सिम्बल हेतु क्या पूर्व मे किसी भारतीय या विदेशी नागरिक का प्रस्ताव, प्रार्थानपत्र या सुझाव आदि किसी स्तर से प्राप्त हुआ. यदि हाँ तो उसका विवरण.
    उत्तर- श्रीमती नॉनदिता कोरिया, भारतीय नागरिक से सुझाव प्राप्त हुआ था.
    प्रश्न 11- भारतीय रूपये के सिम्बल की आवश्यकता के पीछे मूल कारण की सूचना.
    उत्तर- इस विभाग के विज्ञापन मे उल्लेख किया गया है.
    प्रश्न १२- प्रत्येक डिजाइन के प्रजेंटेसन हेतु कितना समय निर्धारित किया गया था.
    उत्तर- दस मिनट तथा जूरी द्वारा उठाए गए प्रश्नों के उत्तर का समय.
    प्रश्न 13- जूरी ने केवल पाँच सिम्बल चयनित किये या उससे अधिक भी.
    उत्तर- विज्ञापन के अनुसार जूरी को केवल पाँच प्रतीकों का चयन करना था.
    प्रश्न १४- गाइडलाइन मे उल्लिखित “स्टैंडर्ड की बोर्ड” से क्या आशय है
    उत्तर- computero मे लगा सामान्य की बोर्ड.
    प्रश्न १५- अंतिम डिजाइन के चयन के पश्चात क्या शेष समस्त डिजाइनो का स्क्रिप्ट सहित प्रकाशन वेब साईट पर किया जायेगा.
    उत्तर- नहीं.
    प्रश्न 16- जूरी द्वारा पाँच प्रतिभागियों के चयन की संस्तुति किस तिथि को प्रेषित की गयी तथा वित्त मंत्रालय को किस तिथि को प्राप्त हुई.
    उत्तर- १५-१२-२००९ को.
    प्रश्न १७- क्या जूरी ने पाँच प्रतिभागियों मे से फायनल एक की भी संस्तुति की है.
    उत्तर- अंतिम निर्णय विचाराधीन है.
    प्रश्न १८- कुल अर्ह ३३३१ अभ्यर्थियों द्वारा डिमांड ड्राफ्ट द्वारा प्रेषित रुपया कितना है.
    उत्तर- २६४४ योग्य अभ्यर्थियों के द्वारा भेजे गए ५००-५०० रुपए डिमांड के ड्राफ्ट जमा किये गए.
    Mb. 09450456464

  31. rakesh Says:

    SHRI SURJIT SINGH, Director & Appellate Authority Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Economic Affairs North Bloc, New Delhi-1 F.No. 3/40/2010-RTI Dated 12th February, 2010 had given me Information under RTI Act, 2005.
    (Reg. The Symbol for Indian rupee competition)
    In the matter of:

    This appeal has been filed by Shri Rakesh kumar singh against the order dated 7.1.2020 of the CPIO of Department of Economic Affairs.

    2. In his application dated 14-12-2009 addressed to the CPIO, the applicant had sought information on 14 points relating to the competition of symbol of Indian rupee. The CPIO furnished the information on 7-1-2010. The appellant is not satisfied with the information furnished on 3 points, i.e. Point No. 1, 4 & 13 and hence this appeal on these points.
    3. Comments of CPIO have been invited. The points on which the appellant is not satisfied with the reply of the CPIO and the factual position is discussed in the succeeding paragraphs.
    4. In point No.1 of his application, the applicant had asked in information about the name, profession and the home-state of the members of Jury appointed by the Government for finalisation of the design of Indian Rupee. The CPIO furnished the name/designation of the member of the jury along with the organization and place where the organization is located. The information relating to home-state of the member is not maintained and as such this information cannot be provided.
    5. In point No.4, the applicant had asked information as to the number of total designs received and out of those how many have been rejected. The CPIO informed him that there were 3,331 eligible entries, out of which 5 Final entries were selected by the Jury. This should satisfy the query of the applicant.
    6. In point No. 13, applicant had sought information about the date and mode of information to the contestants about the selection of 5 designs. The CPIO had informed him that final result is yet to be decided. In the comments, CPIO had intimated that the information to the selected contestants was sent on 25-11-2009 through letter. This information was also posted on the website of the Ministry in December 2009. This should satisfy the query of the applicant.
    7. In view of above observations, the appeal is disposed off.

  32. rakesh Says:

    Sory curect file number..
    F.No. 3/4/2010-RTI Dated 12th February, 2010

  33. annam Says:

    GOR G.K. news

  34. RK Says:

    Latest news. Reg. symbol for indian rupee

  35. rakesh kr singh Says:

    Please Pay attention towards this also..,top-5-rupee-symbol.html

  36. Rdhika Says:


    if I not forgotten This Mr uday is the same guy who sent 4 entries for the contest, and as per the rules he shouldn’t be eligible for the contest.

    Second thing, can any any say, as per the rules how this logo representing Indian History?

  37. Rakesh Kumar Singh Says:

    Indian rupee symbol comp. not fair Pl read latest news
    Meanwhile, Rakesh Kumar Singh, an employee of the Uttar Pradesh state government, alleged there were irregularities in the selection process.
    Singh, who had entered the competition to design a symbol, said he had sought information on the process under the Right to Information (RTI) Act as he suspected that bureaucratic bungling had vitiated the process.
    Details of the replies to his RTI application are posted on the website
    The seven-member jury was headed by RBI deputy governor Usha Thorat, and included representatives from the Central government and design institutes. She could not be reached for comment.
    According to Soni, the cabinet’s discussions did not touch upon claims of flaws in the selection process.
    “It was not discussed,” Soni said. “(The) RTI query was neither raised nor discussed.
    When asked about Singh’s claims about the selection process, a member of the jury, who did not want to be identified, said the jury was not aware of the RTI application.
    As the aim of the entire process is to standardize the expression of the rupee globally, the symbol will be included in the Unicode standard for representation and processing of texts written in major scripts.
    According to a government statement, the symbol will also be included in Indian standards, or Indian Script Code for Information Interchange (ISCII).
    The ISCII specifies various codes for Indian languages processing on computers along with keyboard layouts.
    The government statement added that the industry lobbies for Indian software and hardware companies, Nasscom and Manufacturers Association for Information Technology, or Mait, would ask their members to make changes needed to allow the rupee’s symbol to be used in texts.
    According to Soni, the Central government would also ask states to encourage people to use the symbol to depict the rupee.

    …….But like all things big, the rupee symbol comes with a dose of controversy. An RTI query has been filed over the selection process of the currency symbol for it not being a fair and transparent process. According to the RTI applicant, not everyone in the jury was present while selecting the symbol. Soni said the RTI query was not discussed in the cabinet meeting.

  38. jayadev Says:

    welcome to my designs at

  39. ra Says:

    नई दिल्ली.रुपया समस्याओं को पैदा करता है और सफलता विवादों को। भारतीय रुपए का नया प्रतीक भी इन दोनों से अछूता नहीं बचा। दो असफल प्रत्याशियों ने दावा किया है कि प्रतीक चिन्ह के चयन में खासा घालमेल हुआ व ये दोषपूर्ण रहा। अनिल खत्री और आरके सिंह ने अपने दावे को पुष्ट करने के लिए वित्त मंत्रालय द्वारा मुहैया कराए गए आरटीआई जवाब का सहारा लिया है। दोनों ही के डिजाइन चयनित हुए थे, लेकिन अंतिम पांच तक वे नहीं पहुंच सके। …..
    Read Full news..

  40. vaishu Says:

    is thr any contest for desigining symbol indian coin?

  41. Anil Shri Says:
    परत-दर-परत उघड़ रही हैं रुपये के भ्रष्टाचार की परतें

  42. anil Says:

    News update.

    Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh had submitted a LPA petition in the Delhi High Court challenging Delhi HC earlier judgment in which court had refused to entertain his petition challenging selection process of New Indian Rupee Symbol.

    After hearing the LPA, Hon’ble Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna of Delhi High Court in their judgment said “We learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal as he really does not have the grievance solely because the symbol has not been accepted but he intends to challenge the procedural aspects which are adopted by the Union of India at various levels relating to such kind of works which affect various provisions of the Official Languages Act and many other provisions of various statutes as well as Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

    If we understand the submission of Mr. Sawhney in a proper perspective, he wants to file a petition in the larger public interest.

    In view of the aforesaid, we are inclined to permit the withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file a Public Interest Litigation with the appropriate pleadings and data which are necessary to sustain a Public Interest Litigation.”

    LPA 310/2011


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: