Building independent financial regulators

Simon Johnson has written a super article comparing lack of independent defence experts Post WW-II and lack of independent financial experts post this crisis.

First the problem:

One striking aspect of the public debate about the future of derivatives – and how best to regulate them – is that almost all the available experts work for one of the major broker-dealers.

There are a couple of prominent and credible voices among people who used to work in the industry, including Frank Partnoy and Satyajit Das.  And there are a number of top academics, but if they help run trading operations they are often unwilling to go on-the-record and if they don’t trade, they lack legitimacy on Capitol Hill and in the media.

The same was the problem after WWII. There was a problem of defence companies capturing the defence department.

The defense sector faced a similar problem after World War II.  The rising importance of technology in combat meant that the military needed specialized suppliers who would invest large amounts of private capital in developing tanks, airplanes, radar, and other types of equipment.  But there was – and still is – a real danger that these companies would capture the Defense Department and push it to buy overly expensive and ineffective technologies (or worse).

President Eisenhower famously warned in 1960, as he was leaving office, about the military-industrial complex.  His concise remarks were brilliant – look at the text or YouTube versions.  And C. Wright Mills’ influential The Power Elite, published in 1956, put weapons suppliers at the center of our national power structure. (link: ; but this may be copyright violation.)

How did defence sector solve the problem? By building an independent defence lab

Constraining the power of military contractors is a hard problem — and you might say that we have not completely succeeded, depending on your view of Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.

But, at least in terms of weapons design and procurement, we have made some progress in developing a set of highly skilled independent engineers, as argued by Larry Candell in the latest issue of Harvard Business Review under the heading “A military approach to keeping the economy safe.”

Mr. Candell is an interested party — from a leadership role at  Lincoln Labs, he explains that this organization provides an independent design and evaluation capability that is not government bureaucracy and definitely not a profit-oriented military contractor. (Disclosure: Lincoln Labs is part of M.I.T., where I work.)

Same solution is suggested for financial markets

Irrespective of what you think about the defense business, Mr. Candell’s proposal vis-à-vis finance is intriguing. He thinks the government should set up its own arms-length labs (or sponsor nonprofit research organizations to do the same) that would concentrate on testing financial derivative products in test-bed-type settings.

This would not, of course, be the same as trading in real markets. But with today’s computer resources and plenty of unemployed finance talent at hand, it should be possible to develop individual people and a broader organizational capacity able to test the effects of various kinds of derivatives on customers, as well as on overall financial-system stability.

The proposed National Institute of Finance would have similar broad goals — and the National Institutes of Health is an appealing model — but as the institute is currently proceeding with industry backing (e.g., Morgan Stanley, Bank of America), we should be skeptical.

We definitely need independent derivatives experts who can be called to testify before Congress or work in an administration. They must have a deep understanding of financial markets, as well as hands-on experience with products that are dangerous to our economic health.

I had written about this breakthrough idea suggested by Candell. in my previous post as well – Breakthrough ideas for 2010.

I think it is not a bad idea. I mean we need to test as many ideas to help us regulate financial markets better. Some should click and some would fail.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: