On visiting Nobel Prize website, I found out that this year economics prize will be given on October 11, 2010(Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel is a more correct award name).
Who will win it this time?
I havent come across any website/link predicting some picks. Thomson Reuters come out with a list but it is towards late September. Other bloggers/economists will come out with a list as the award date nears.
Last year, couple of choices cropped up and most popular on the list were William Nordhaus (Sterling Professor of Economics, Yale University) and Martin Weitzman ( Professor of Economics, Harvard University) fo their work on Environment Economics. Then names of Fama/French, Shiller/Thaler etc were also on the list.
Lat year I also said this which is apt even now:
This year’s award is going to be interesting as world economy goes through sharpest recession/crisis since Great Depression. The crisis has seen nearly every modern eco theory/idea coming under severe scanner. So, any pick will be a challenge for the Commmitee.The last time such a challenge was faced is for 1998. In 1997 the nobel prize was given to Scholes and Merton for Option Pricing Theory. The duo were partners st LTCM which collapsed in 1998 leading to much criticism for the award. It was then given in 1998 to Amartya Sen whose candidature was seen as non-controversial and was long-pending.
This time the challenge is much more given the severity of the crisis. Would it be someone from Institutional Economics to stress on their importance? Or someone from Environmental Economics to push research/thinking in this very important concern? I really don’t know.
The award was finally given to Ostrom and Williamson for their work on commons and institutions. So in a way I was kind of right.
The same situation applies even now and infact it is quite worse. So many economists have come forward criticising state of economics and calling it dark age of economics. So, big resurrection is needed and non-controversial names to be picked. Given the choices available, environmental economics looks the safest bet.
I will keep pointing to links etc as soon as others chip ion with their predictions as well. Vistors to this blog, kindly respond. Who do you think will take the award in these pressure times in field of economics?
Update:
Thomson Reuters comes out with its 2010 predictions:
Nathaniel Ropes Professor of Political Economics, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA
Why: for theoretical and empirical studies on the relationship between politics and macroeconomics, and specifically for research on politico-economic cycle
Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton NJ USA
Why: for formulation of the Kiyotaki-Moore model, which describes how small shocks to an economy may lead to a cycle of lower output resulting from a decline in collateral values that creates a restrictive credit environment
George Watson’s and Daniel Stewart’s Professor of Political Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, and Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, London School of Economics, London, England
Why: for formulation of the Kiyotaki-Moore model, which describes how small shocks to an economy may lead to a cycle of lower output resulting from a decline in collateral values that creates a restrictive credit environment
George J. Stigler Distinguished Service Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL USA, and Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford CA USA
Why: for pioneering empirical research in social economics, including wage inequality and labor demand, unemployment, addiction, and the economic return of investment in medical research, among other topics
Interesting choices again. Though I doubt whether Alesina will make it. He has lately been in the news for his analysis and comments that fiscal consolidation leads to growth. But there is no doubt that his work on political economy is very good.
Kiyotaki and Moore’s works are much in demand after this crisis. They truly deserve it for shaping the macro-finance models and linking financial cycles to macroeconomic ones.
Murphy is an interesting and different choice. A great mind who has linked economics with many different fields.
Thomson Reuters has also released a pending list and each one could get as well:
•2002-2005: Robert J. Barro; Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French; Paul Michael Romer; Richard H. Thaler
•2006: Jagdish N. Bhagwati and Avinash K. Dixit; Dale W. Jorgenson; Oliver D. Hart and Bengt R. Holmstrom
•2007: Elhanan Helpman and Gene M. Grossman; Jean Tirole; Robert B. Wilson and Paul R. Milgrom
•2008: Lars P. Hansen and Thomas J. Sargent, and Christopher A. Sims; Martin S. Feldstein; Armen A. Alchian and Harold Demsetz
•2009: Ernst Fehr and Matthew J. Rabin; William D. Nordhaus and Martin L. Weitzman; John B. Taylor and Jordi Gali and Mark L. Gertler
That is quite a list. May the best one win.
Addendum:
As it is very year, there is a lot of discussio on the topic. So many people have written their predictions on the post. From comments Daron Acemoglu seems to be very popular.
- Tyler Cowen makes his predictions.
- iPredict website is running contracts to predict the winner. So far, Shiller and Thaler are leading the list.Shiller’s probability is 30.10% and Thaler is at 28.2%. (HT: MR)
September 10, 2010 at 12:08 am
I predict
DARON ACEMOGLU for 2010 Noble prize in Economics.
September 13, 2010 at 3:52 pm
Lars Hansen,Tomas Sargent,Robert Barro,Robert Townsend,wish them good luck this time(They deserve it,don‘t they?)。
Andrei Shleifer,Matthew Rabin,Richard Thaler, for their pioneering work in behavioral economics。
September 14, 2010 at 2:09 pm
Professor Kaushik Basu of Cornell, for his contribution to theory of games in understanding human behaviour and his contribution to development economics
September 20, 2010 at 9:19 pm
C. Sims for econometrics
Peter Diamond for Optimal taxation A Public Debt
Paul Romer for End Economic Growth
Jean tirole For regulation and Game Theory
September 20, 2010 at 10:26 pm
Robert Shiller deserves it this time.
September 22, 2010 at 1:02 am
D. Mortensen and C. Pissarides for Matching Models of the Labor Market; or
P. Romer, P. Aghion and P. Howitt for Endogenous Growth Theory
September 30, 2010 at 2:53 pm
[…] er faktisk gode bud, selvom Helpman sandsynligvis skule dele en eventuel pris med Gene Grossman. Mostly Economics nævner miljøøkonomerne William Nordhaus og Martin Weitzman som gode og politiske korrekte bud. […]
October 4, 2010 at 5:01 pm
DARON ACEMOGLU deserves it!
October 4, 2010 at 7:02 pm
Michael Porter for his work on competitive advantage
October 4, 2010 at 8:58 pm
Dear ALL,
the brief history (1969-2009) of the Economics NOBEL has seen
many great economists win the crown but its also sprinkled with many
IgNOBEL misses ( the likes of Kalecki, Kaldor, Robinson, Bauer,
Bhagwati; to name but a few !)…………… therefore, the history
and the mystic, reaffirm that the Nobel committee might spring
surprises again !
Having said that, one more pertinent point is that
much of the economics profession has been caught wrongfooted through
the spasms of the Great Recession ( 2007-10 ?)
therefore, a field which is both non-controversial (
most noble for linked to Mother Nature, herself) and at the same time,
absolutely indispensable to the future of mankind and planet
earth…….i.e. environmental economics; should and will emerge as
the clear winner this time around (11th october).
a prize to environmental econ. is long due; exceptional
economists like Nordhaus, Thaler and Norgaard have made great
contributions to the discipline………………they must and will
win this time !!!
another very important factor in their favor is that, the
economics Nobel has become interdisciplinary….. last year’s winner,
Elinor OSTROM is a political scientist ! the 2002 winners Daniel
Kahneman & Vernon Smith were trained psychologists; since an
environment scholar has not won it + the perils of untrammelled
‘global finance’ and the proliferation of the GDP growth numbers
around the world, depleting the constant supplies of the fixed natural
resource base, spelling DOOM over a foreseeable future; the world
chorus for ‘sustainability’………… means that the prize this
time will go to environmental economics !!!
its not that the environment and the sustainability thing has
not been recognized by the Nobel committee… the peace award to Al
Gore & the IPCC; the 2004 peace award to Wangaari Mathai for the Green
Belt Movement…………………..
therefore, the most ‘NOBLE’ of fields in economics; ie,
environmental economics , which is devising and recommending the most
‘NOVEL’ of approaches for the global economy, should, must & will win
the economics ‘NOBEL’ this time !!!!
October 5, 2010 at 1:10 am
I predict
Jean Tirole and Richard Schmalensee for Economics of Multi-sided Platforms.
October 5, 2010 at 2:43 am
This might finally be the year when the organizers realise that Nobel never intended economists to be awareded this prize – especially in the light of the mainstream of the discipline failing to advance the subject beyond the usual ludicrous assumptions. Cēterīs paribus!
October 5, 2010 at 5:43 pm
I predict Cliff Chew Kuo Ting for his works on New Economic Geography
October 5, 2010 at 5:45 pm
Yes! Cliff deserves it!
October 5, 2010 at 5:46 pm
Cliff’s works have been ground breaking to say the least
October 5, 2010 at 6:38 pm
Interesting the beginning qualifying statement regarding the ‘real’ name of this prize…just to remind the followers of the economic prize of its second class status nature to the ‘real’ Nobel prizes…
October 5, 2010 at 10:04 pm
Kevin Murphy
October 6, 2010 at 1:48 am
Daron Acemoglu will get this time, I think.
October 6, 2010 at 11:37 am
Kyle, Glosten, Milgrom for their work on market microstructure?
October 6, 2010 at 10:12 pm
We just had one for economic geography. However unfair it may be, another geography winner is unlikely right now.
October 7, 2010 at 12:49 am
Economic theory contributes the policy, not just for the government, but also for the individual behavior. For that manner, the theory should be the benefits to the society paralleling the idea of the prize. It’s the peer prize since it’s academia based contribution, so it’s not biased when the expectation revealed in Lars Hansen, Tomas Sargent, Eugene Fama, Bengt Holmstrom, Oliver Hart, Jean Trole, Andreu Mas-Colell
October 7, 2010 at 9:06 am
Paul m romer, gene gross man, e. Helpmann
Nordvhaus, m. Wetzman,
N. Roubini, shiller
October 8, 2010 at 8:31 pm
Grossman, Helpmann never for end growth (or anything else). It should be either Romer, Aghion, Howitt (better) or Romer is some other combination. Doubt this year though…
October 9, 2010 at 7:33 pm
Jordi Galí!!
October 9, 2010 at 9:56 pm
Me, i wish that governance theorist wins this year, but to be realistic, Robert J shiller and his works on Behavioural Finance
October 9, 2010 at 10:05 pm
Me, i wish that governance theorist wins this year, but to be realistic, Robert J shiller and his works on Behavioural Finance deserve Nobel 2010
October 10, 2010 at 10:16 pm
Hi everybody, I am a political and development economist by profession. All the opinions and speculations above are very interesting and each has merit, although in the wake of the Great Economic Meltdown at Wall Street someone who has worked against received wisdom and orthodox theories in economics should be awarded like Joe Stiglitz in the aftermath of the Asian Financial crisis and his subnsequent resignation from the World Bank, and the award to Paul Krugman last year. Perhaps it’s too early in his year, but the Cambridge economist Ha-Joon Cgang should get a Nobel nod in my opinion. His latest book is a stern and informed critique of capitalism, while remaining committed to capitalist values. His past work has been a critique of the ‘development’ policies of developed states which work against developing countries and thus endanger global prosperity. I also like the chances of Robert Shiller and Pranab Bardhan.
October 11, 2010 at 12:20 am
what about rubinstein?
October 11, 2010 at 9:55 am
How about Nouriel Roubini?
October 11, 2010 at 2:45 pm
Joel Hasbrouck, Hans Stoll, or Maureen O’Hara.
October 11, 2010 at 7:37 pm
The Nobel Prize in Economics brought up controversy in 1979 when two economists shared that prestigious prize,namely Dr Théodore Schultz and
Sir Arthur Lewis,even though their theories were opposite to each other.
This led,then,Albert O Hirschman,a well known economist specializing in
Latin America,to levy a heavy criticism,claiming that the scholars supposed
to share that prize ,provide consensus ,not paradoxes.Of course,the choice
is hard,and the candidates for such an Honor are numerous.Some winners
forgot about that prize,because of their age.In fact,Professor Leonid Hurwick,
from the University of Minnesota,Twin Cities,did get such a Prize,at 90 of age,
that was a record set for the first time.Remembering that this Prize was awarded for the first time,in 1969,one of the two recipients was Jan Tinbergen
January 5, 2011 at 12:38 pm
[…] The busiest day of the year was October 11th with 2,622 views. The most popular post that day was Nobel Prize for Economics 2010 Predictions. […]
March 15, 2012 at 9:33 am
Internet Radio…
[…]Nobel Prize for Economics 2010 Predictions « Mostly Economics[…]…