Archive for December 18th, 2014

Book review: Merchants of Tamilakam

December 18, 2014

An interesting book which takes you to Tamil business history, dating 2000 years back. It is written by Kanakalatha Mukund who used to teach at Mumbai university.  This book is one of the several books being edited by Gurcharan Das on Indian business history. One of the related books on Marwari history was also reviewed earlier.

This book takes you to early medieval period where Tamil region in the South had something called Sangam poetry. Through the poetry, one gets great explanation and understanding of how things worked during that time. And once again no matter how hard we try and show things are different, much of the things are pretty similar. The businesses existed and thrived even during those times with basic systems of governance and institutions being present facilitating  the overall economic environment.

The interesting aspect of those times in Tamil region was there was no strong ruler as such. You had Pallava and Chola dynasties but none too powerful. But what they did was not to intervene in businesses. They let the business story grow. The business community in turn built its own sets of institutions and mechanisms (like guilds, local business associations etc.) to keep things going.

The book has a fascinating description of how temples played a central role dring those times. In fact temples were like banks which accepted deposits and donations and paid interest on them. Further, these donations etc were circulated around the economy leading to multiplier effects. Temples gave their additonal lands as leases for development of agriculture etc asking the farmers to give certain % of produce to the temple making the temple self-sufficient. This produce fed the priests and also prepared the prasadam and so on.

The merchants traded and coins etc from Roman kingdom have been found. The Roman coins seem to be accepeted as a major currency as well perhaps due to shortages of local currency and other factors. Then there is discussion on taxation and interest rates as well. So pretty much a modern economy, so to say.

Good light read. Just one thing. It could have been organised a little better. It does not have the flow as one would like..

Explaining what it costs to produce a product can potentially increase its sales

December 18, 2014

As a buyer one always wonders the reason behind pricing. Why does a product cost x? What goes behind this x? What are the costs for making the product and so on?

Research by  Bhavya Mohan, Ryan Buell, and Leslie John shows that if a company explains the costs of various things on the price tags, people are more favorable towards buying the same.

When a company sets a price for a product, shoppers typically have no idea what it costs to produce that item. But it turns out that consumers reward efforts to lay out these figures—to deconstruct the price tag.

In fact, new research shows that when a company selling T-shirts, for example, itemizes what it spends on cotton, cutting, sewing, dyeing, finishing, and transporting each shirt, consumers become more attracted to the brand and more likely to purchase.

“By unpacking the costs, you have the opportunity to explain everything you did for the customer in putting that product or service together,” saysBhavya Mohan, a Harvard Business School doctoral student in marketing. “When firms communicate the effort that went into making a good, consumers tend to value the product more.”

Quite intuitive..


How the first thing Nazis did after invasion of a country was to rob central banks ..

December 18, 2014

Fascinating history and there is a book on this – Chasing Gold: The Incredible Story of How the Nazis Stole Europe’s Bullion. by George Taber.

This article summarises the main idea behind the book:

To keep Hitler’s war machine going, the Nazis captured bullion from European central banks that today would be worth $19 billion, writes George M. Taber, author of Chasing Gold: The Incredible Story of How the Nazis Stole Europe’s Bullion.

Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht was Adolph Hitler’s moneyman, and for six crucial years he formulated the dictator’s economic program. At the time, Schacht was Germany’s most famous and respected financier because he had broken the country’s hyperinflation of 1923, one of history’s worst. At the height of that financial crisis, one American dollar was worth 4,210,500,000,000 marks. Schacht in 1932 threw his immense reputation and economic skills behind Hitler and became both the president of the Nazi central bank and the finance minister.

….The centerpiece of Schacht’s economic policy for Hitler was autarky, or total self-sufficiency. During World War I, the British blockade had starved the German people and eventually defeated them. Nearly a half million Germans died of starvation. That prompted Berlin in 1917 to resume submarine warfare in hopes of defeating the Allies before the Americans got into the war. The strategy failed. That blockade experience left the Germans with the post-war determination never again to depend on other countries for vital imports.

Nature had not blessed Germany with all the vital products needed for the country’s war machine. Without them the Nazi army would be little more than toy soldiers.

There was only one problem. Nature had not blessed Germany with all the vital products needed for the country’s war machine. Without them the Nazi army would be little more than toy soldiers. While Germany had plenty of low-grade iron ore to make weapons, it lacked the high-grade steel used in the manufacture of tanks and bombers. Low-grade iron ore, though, could be turned into a higher quality product with the help of a metal known as tungsten or wolfram. That could be bought from Spain and Portugal.

Germany was also short of oil to fuel tanks and bombers. The Germans began a successful crash program to make synthetic oil, but they could still not produce needed high grade oil. That they bought largely from Romania, which fueled the Nazi tanks that invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941. Chromium was another natural resource needed for warfare that Germany lacked. They bought that from Turkey. Sweden also supplied the Germans with ball bearings, another important material.

These five neutral countries wereok with Gold but not with Marks:

Those five supposedly neutral countries would not accept German Reichsmarks in payment for the war goods, but they would take gold. Part of the world’s bullion resides in private hands, but the vast majority of it is in central banks. Willy Sutton robbed banks because that’s where the money was. The Nazis robbed central banks because that’s where the gold was. Swiss bankers played a crucial role in the transactions by being the financial middlemen.

Austria was the first victim of Nazi aggression in the spring of 1938. Because of his close relations with the Bank for International Settlements, which he had helped start, Schacht knew that the Austrian central bank had about 100 tons of gold. That was almost four times as much as the Germans had at the time. When the Wehrmacht marched into Vienna on Saturday morning March 12, Wilhelm Keppler, a businessman and early Hitler backer, and two armed Nazi commandoes arrived at the Austrian Central Bank and took the Austrian gold to Berlin. The Germans forced the Austrian central bank to transfer an additional 5.7 tons that it had shipped to London for safekeeping.

The Nazis also demanded that Vienna’s large and wealthy Jewish community hand over to Berlin 14.3 tons of their private gold. Schacht immediately departed for Vienna to lead the Nazi takeover of the Austrian central bank. In a festive celebration at its headquarters, he led the staff in a pledge of allegiance to Hitler, asking them to join him in “a triple Sieg Heil to ourFührer.”

The windfall arrived at a crucial time for the Nazis. By mid-1938, Berlin was almost out of foreign currency and gold largely because of its rearmament program and would have been forced to cut back their war buildup. On October 3, 1938, Emil Puhl, who soon became vice-president of the Reichsbank, wrote in a memo, “The rapid implementation of rearmament was only possible because of the use of available gold, foreign exchange from the former Reich, and the immediate recovery of Austrian gold, foreign raw material, and valuable securities reserves.”

When the Germans later invaded other European countries, one of their first stops was always the local central bank. After quickly learning what had happened in Austria, foreign central bankers desperately tried to get the gold out of their countries. Usually the bullion was sent an ocean away to Canada and the United States, where it was stored temporarily at the New York Federal Reserve vaults in lower Manhattan but eventually went to Fort Knox. Even the Vatican secretly sent nearly eight tons of gold to New York.

In the darkest days of the Blitz in May 1940, the Bank of England shipped 2,000 tons across the U-boat infested Atlantic. That included not only Britain’s gold but also large stashes held for other countries. Amazingly, not a single ship was sunk. The British nicknamed the secret cargo margarine. After the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, Stalin’s Politburo voted to send by train their three most valuable properties 900 miles to the Eastern side of the Ural Mountains to keep them out of Hitler’s hands. The three: Lenin’s embalmed body, the art works of Leningrad’s Hermitage Museum, and 2,800 tons of gold.

 In the end they had around $600 mn worth of gold:

The Nazis eventually captured some $600 million worth of gold, which today would be worth $19 billion Twitter . That kept Hitler’s war machine going for five years. At the end of World War II in 1945, the Reichsbank still had nearly 300 tons on hand, which was more than it had at the beginning of the conflict. Without the stolen central bank gold, Adolph Hitler would have been an insignificant player in world history.



Dutch Bankers take a religious oath…

December 18, 2014

Well, well, well..What does one say to this news HT: MR Blog).

Dutch bankers are now taking an oath vowing not to engage in unethtical fin practices:


%d bloggers like this: