Has the manager in information age become like a zamindar (landowner) of industrial age?

Nice food for thought piece by Ajit Balakrishnan.

He says how the developments in IT era are leading managers role to become redundant. This is far cry from the earlier world where manager ruled the world:

The inner world of organisations then was, in this scheme, divided into people who “do” things, writing accounts ledgers (or operating computers that did that), making sales calls, or driving trucks; and “managers”, who did none of the above but merely “managed” all the doers who did these things. Managers wrote reports (or corrected reports written by others for them), attended meetings and made presentations. In the media industries, “managers” were not supposed to come up with creative ideas or write scripts or articles or shoot films; their job was to supervise others who did such things and make sure that all these creators abided by company “policy”.

The only catch to this scheme of Sloan and Weber (not to mention Peter Drucker and the other worthies whose books are the staple of airport bookshops) is such routine-isable supervisory functions are the very ones that an algorithm can do better than a human being. Just as in the industrial era, inventors who spotted a repetitive action in manufacturing would immediately design a machine that could do the repetitive action, in the current age, any information-processing task or sequence of tasks are the target of algorithm designers.

When you present a cheque for cash at a bank you no longer need a human being to check in a ledger whether you have a balance in your account before authorising the cashier to pay you the cash – you present your card at an ATM machine that checks your balance electronically and spews out cash. The bank managers and their flocks – and even the bank branch itself – have started disappearing.

It is in the industries that live and breathe on the design, writing and implementation of computer software that the “manager” is disappearing the fastest. Till recently, it was believed that for every half-dozen people who write computer code you need a “manager” to supervise them. This manager was supposed to listen to external parties, understand their requirements, translate these requirements to the actual code-writers and explain the result back to these external parties. Except that a year or two of not writing code yourself can make this “manager” unable to join the conversation.

Some changes are evident in finance:

There is some evidence that firms in the financial service industry – who till now have been the single largest employer of fresh MBAs, accounting for a third or more of placement at many elite business schools – are starting to re-look at their practice of making a general-purpose MBA as a pre-requisite for entry. In their book, Rethinking the MBA: Business Education at a Crossroads, Srikant Datar and his co-authors quote a senior manager at a top bank as saying that in their hiring they are “aggressively pursuing PhDs in business, finance, mathematics, physics, and operations. The common thread is that all are people who are highly analytical and can translate complex situations into mathematical models. The percentage of MBAs that we hire will go down in the next ten years”. If there ever was a signal that the general-purpose liberal education that management schools provided so far has to give way to a strong injection of and data science skills, this is it.

In leading companies in Information Age industries, the word “manager” is taking on a pejorative meaning – something like “zamindar” – a man who lived off other people’s work and did no work himself.

However, these notions of “managers” and what constitutes “management work”is not going to go away that quickly; just the other day a very bright young entry-level woman who works in our company came beaming to tell me she was getting married. What does your future husband do, I asked her. He is doing very level in his company, she said, he is a manager, he has six people reporting to him.

Nice bit..

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: