Mudra Bank – new regime, old philosophy..

Debashis Basu reflects on the decision to create a new bank  – MUDRA bank.  He wonders the obsession to create new financial instis in each new govt:

For some strange reason, every new government wants to launch a new bank, or a major financial institution and multiple financial products. Previous governments have been responsible for superfluous organisations like IDFC with headquarters in Chennai, the Bharatiya Mahila Bank in 2013, the Rajiv Gandhi Equity Scheme, etc.

The Narendra Modi government, following the same path, may well outdo previous governments, because Mr Modi, like Indira Gandhi, believes the government alone can “fix” the many problems India has. In just 10 months, the government has launched Jan Dhan Yojana with a lot of fanfare and a financial product called the Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme in January this year. On April 8, probably with as much fanfare and full-page ads in newspapers, the government will announce the launch of the Micro Units Development and Refinance Agency (Mudra) Bank.

Is there a need for Mudra Bank? Well, arguments can always be cooked up to support a direct government intervention to solve any one of our many chronic problems. One such problem is inequitable availability of finance. Too much of capital goes to large companies and too little to small businessmen. This is unfortunate because study after study has proved that not only are smaller borrowers more honest in repaying debt, but collectively they have a huge economic impact.

Mudra Bank will be another such attempt:

Mudra Bank will be a Rs 20,000-crore institution, which would “primarily be responsible for refinancing all micro-finance institutions which are in the business of lending to micro and small business entities”. It will be supported by an additional Rs 3,000 crore from the Budget to create a credit guarantee corpus to guaranteeing loans being provided to the micro enterprises. It would partner with state-/regional-level coordinators to provide finance to the “last-mile financier” of small and micro business enterprises. Not to forget that it will “primarily be responsible for laying down policy guidelines for micro/small enterprise financing business; registration, regulation and accreditation/rating of MFI entities; laying down responsible financing practices to ward off indebtedness and ensure proper client protection principles and methods of recovery”.

It would also be “responsible for the development of a standardised set of covenants governing last-mile lending to micro/small enterprises; promoting right technology solutions for the last mile; formulating and running a credit guarantee scheme and creating a good architecture of last-mile credit delivery to micro businesses under the scheme of Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana.”

Phew! So Mudra Bank will be a lender, consultant, regulator, think tank and an agent of social change, all rolled in one. Unfortunately, if this is what Mudra Bank is supposed to be, it will suffer from a congenital defect at birth: too many conflicting objectives – something that beset Unit Trust of India earlier and still affects government-controlled banks and insurance companies. This is how all public sector units used to be conceived. Clearly, the babus who have drawn up the Mudra Bank seem to belong to the 1970s, too, not just the idea.

There have been so many in the past:

But wait a minute. What can Mudra Bank do that can’t be done now with some tweaking of the existing system? I dug around a bit and discovered, to my horror, that successive governments have focused on microlending for decades. As a result, the has already inherited a massive bureaucracy and welfare system meant for small businessmen. This includes:

  • Small Industries Development Bank of India
  • National Small Industries Corporation
  • National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
  • Credit Guarantee Scheme
  • Priority sector lending by all banks
  • Regional rural banks
  • Bharatiya Mahila Bank
  • National Scheduled Castes Finance and Development Corporation
  • National Scheduled Tribes Finance and Development Corporation
  • National Backward Classes Finance and Development Corporation
  • 18 State Financial Corporations
  • 25 State Industrial Development Corporations
  • Microfinance programmes
  • Assistance to Entrepreneurship Development Institutes
  • National Innovation Foundation
  • A Rs 10,000-crore fund announced in the 2014 Budget for promoting entreprneurship.

Mudra Bank will be backed by a Rs 3,000-crore credit guarantee scheme. But a credit guarantee scheme is already functioning for the past decade. Till August 31, 2014, cumulatively 1,599,128 proposals from micro and small enterprises have been approved for guarantee cover for aggregate credit of Rs 79,647.15 crore.

There are at least three ministries now involved in helping small business in some way or the other: finance; micro, small and medium enterprises; and a new ministry of skill development and entrepreneurship; apart from ministries like tribal affairs and social justice running their own sectarian schemes for tribals and scheduled castes, respectively. I may have missed a few more organisations and the many departmental schemes that try to put money extorted from taxpayers, into the pockets of chosen people.

This array of government companies, schemes and initiatives overseen by a vast bureaucracy, based on some warped but failed notion of government-delivered equity, was not enough for Mr Modi. He had to set up a new bank, another new bureaucracy, borrowing ideas of the 1970s, even as there is no accountability for taxpayers’ money already wasted on numerous initiatives to “support” small businesses of various kinds. And this from a regime that had promised minimum government. What a shame!

We have anyways made too much out of the change. All that is happening is packaging old wine in new bottle. Both central bank and government’s obsession with creating new banking organisations shows neglect/ignorance of India’s financial history. We moved form a highly differentiated banking structure to a consolidated one only to move back to differentiated one..

Just new names are being added to the old (shall we say rejected) ideas..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: