How warranties were made in ancient times?

Elaine has a terrific post on the history of warranties. As there were little products at that time, we didnt have product warranties. So what were warranties for? Buying brides!

In the early days of exchange, humans mostly traded consumables like food or stone tools. There wasn’t much room for misrepresentation because what you saw was what you got.

The was one exception: Brides. In many ancient civilizations, families sold their unmarried daughters to prospective bridegrooms. Barbaric, I know.

A bride was often the biggest purchase a man would ever make (these days it’s a house). But there was no way to measure the quality of the good before buying. A bridegroom couldn’t exactly, uh, take a test drive. To further complicate things, the brides were selected and paid for before they reached marriageable age. It’s kind of like how Tesla Model 3’s require a reservation deposit two years before the expected delivery date.

To protect buyers in uncertain markets, tribes created procedures to prevent deceptive business practices that were eventually codified into law. 

We’ll start with Ancient Sumer.

From Sumer to Babylon to India, she covers variety of warranty regimes….

In the end:

As legal codes evolved, they mostly reflected what was already customary practice.

It would be another several thousand years before George Akerlof published his model on information economics in “The Market for Lemons”. Information asymmetry between buyers and sellers can create messed-up incentives that cause markets to break down, particularly in the case of one-time purchases. In situations where the quality of a good is uncertain at time of purchase, fraud protection laws can help make business practices fair for both consumers and providers, ensuring peace and prosperity for all.

 

2 Responses to “How warranties were made in ancient times?”

  1. MS Says:

    Amol, as usual, I just want to point out some exceptions. Please forgive if my comments seem a bit of cultural snobbery, but I feel the author has not paid enough attention to detail especially about ‘India’.

    For one, there was no single ‘Indian civilization’, and that Arthasastra was just one of the many hundreds of legal systems. From Panchala to Bengal to Kerala, the matrilinear systems were equally present, and Polyandry was normal. Women were not assets, they were heads of household.

    Secondly, the Kanya Sulka has been described in our literature as SYMBOLIC payment for the ‘Gruh Lakshmi’. Only a Western mind will reduce it to to payment for an asset.

    • Amol Agrawal Says:

      Hi MS. Your comments are always welcome and much sought. I learn a lot from you. I would only say atleast this post brought Arthashstra in the discussion! I mean so many Indian authors do not given any credit to work done here? It is as if India never existed before 1991.

      This matrilineal system idea is actually interesting from many fronts. Parts of India were far more inclusive than the world ever was/ Wonder how all this is lost. We always say follow the west for women equality and never say just go back to history..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: