Archive for May 15th, 2017

Why does financial media give such weird posing pictures of economic advisers/policymakers?

May 15, 2017

As rightly said: A picture is worth 100 or more words.

I have been noticing this for a while. Though while writing the previous post and seeing a full related articles, I decided to wrote this post finally.

Why does financial media give such weird pictures of economic advisers/policymakers? It has become habit of our media to report some lecture/comment from economic advisers/policymakers as if they are issuing some kind of sermon. The reporting usually comes with that person’s picture with expressions which are just so dumbfounding.

This has been especially true of portrayal of current Chief Economic Adviser. See his pictures here, here, here (who in the right mind will give a picture like this?), here, here. here and so on. It is not just the current CEA, but previous ones as well (see this,this for previous advisers).

I hope you get the point. If the comment is especially hinted against government the picture could put our Lord Nataraja to shame.

Why is this being done? It is obviously the portrayal of “the economic adviser” as “the pope/priest” who knows it all. The idea is to over glorify the role of the economic adviser as this person whose wisdom and advise will make all of us “developed” in one magic wand. So you put up pictures which back this theme.

Nothing could be more contrarian than this image portrayal…

Why don’t our economic experts/CEOs/analysts/media speak their minds on Indian economy?

May 15, 2017

After a long time, one gets to read a speech which talks about one of the most fundamental problems facing Indian economy: lack of healthy criticism (not negative) of government/RBI policy. It is unbelievable to see these days how often the view of all so called independent minds is similar to the government. Pick the newspaper post any budget or monetary policy and you see so called independent minds praising the policy. Thankfully I am not the only one saying this.

Most do not even mention that their view  before policy was very different from what happened in the policy and just shamelessly switch sides. Those few that admit the divergences call the policy prudent and cleverly shift to other side. There are just very very few who are willing to question the move. But then some of them remain silent fearing trolling. All in all, there are just a handful who are willing to speak their minds and they are not liked.

So it is interesting that the Chief Economic Adviser has raised issues about this behavior in a recent much talked about speech. The speech is provocatively titled as: Competence, Truth and Power: Macro-economic Commentary in India. He says:


India’s Private banks under reporting NPA data..

May 15, 2017

Well there are very few things economics analysts get right. But on this issue, this blog almost gets it right.

More than an year ago this blog wondered and asked the question: how come NPAs accrue only at the public sector banks and not private ones? The post said:

The blogger got into a very interesting discussion with friends who are financial market professionals and very savvy ones at that.

One question that cropped up was how is it that losses in banking are limited mostly to the public sector banks and not the private sector ones? If we have the same set of corporates, why is it that corporates choose to default with public banks and not private ones?  Before viewers think this was some left oriented socialistic leaning group, it was just the opposite. The views of the discussants had emerged after seeing the way banking has been working in India and globally.

This question is going to be dismissed by most as a worthless discussion. Public sector banks make losses as they are owned by govt, have governance issues etc. Obviously, this answer chooses to ignore the kinds of malfeasance we are seeing in global private banks. But this issue of public vs private banks cannot be easily dismissed now with huge losses showing in a foreign bank which actually believes itself as an Indian player.

So what exactly is going on?

In the discussion, one was enlightened on how banking actually works between public and private banks:

  • Most big companies which need big loans first approach public sector banks given latter’s large scale.
  • Those who approach the private sector first usually require smaller loans and are not really so called great companies. So we have an issue of borrower quality with private sector banks which is puzzling.
  •  Contrary to what most imagine, the loan practices of public sector banks are far more stringent and cautious. This is because of fear being caught in some state audit and so on. So you approach a public sector bank, it will sit on the loan for some days/months verifying things before sanctioning the loan. What is termed as a slow and inefficient banking is actually a case of prudent banking.
  • Whereas in private sector, loans are approved as quickly (sorry efficiently) as possible. Very little paper work and formalities are needed. The whole idea is to sell off the loan and look for the next one. This practice has made the private sector more popular with the corporates. However, given they remain smaller than public banks, corporate sector’s choices are limited.
  • Even more interesting was this supposed fact that when public sector banks reject a big loan on the basis of dubious quality, the corporates have little choice but to approach private sector. So, instead of one public sector bank, they might approach 2-3 private sector banks for arranging the loans.
  • Another issue which was raised is with respect to loan sizes being handled by people in the two banks. In public sector banks, it takes years of experience before one starts handling the amount which one handles within few years in private banks. This whole issue of private banks doing better because of young employees is overstretched and overhyped. Banking is all about experience and seeing through multiple business cycles. The more you are experienced, the more cautious and prudent you will be while giving loans. Banking is all about history …
  • Then there is this huge problem of how politicos interfere with bank loan policies and swindle money to their cronies. One was told this is how things are even at private sector banks as well with loans going to those who know the top management. One major objective of bank nationalization was to dismantle this relationship between banks and top companies.

Given all these advantages with public sector banks, why is it that NPAs and losses only accrue in them? The answer given was more interesting. It is because the public sector banks are more transparent with their operations! PSBs are disclosing all these NPAs whereas private sector is just postponing the losses. Latter keeps  giving you more loans to pay off previous loans and the game goes on. It is a ponzi scheme which is actually attributed to PSBs. Why hasn’t this bust so far? It is a matter of time..

It seems the time has come.

Recent news reported how some of the leading private banks have been under reporting NPAs.

Though the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has mandated banks to disclose the full extent of asset quality stress in their books, some private banks, it seems, continue to under-report their bad loan data.

On Friday, YES Bank’s stock price fell six per cent to Rs 1,483.85 on the BSE after a disclosure in its 2016-17 annual report, which said the RBI audit had pegged its total gross non-performing assets (NPAs) at five per cent for financial year 2015-16 (FY16), against the bank’s own assessment of only 0.76 per cent for the same year. 

Analysts also say the under-reporting of numbers is not a phenomenon restricted to YES Bank. Foreign brokerage firm Credit Suisse said Axis Bank’s NPAs, according to the RBI audit, were higher at 4.5 per cent of loans versus 1.78 per cent reported by the bank in FY16, while ICICI Bank’s reported numbers at 5.85 per cent were lower than the RBI’s figure of seven per cent.

These two banks are yet to come up with their annual reports, but disclosed the numbers in a conference call with analysts after their March 2017 quarter results.

The RBI had asked banks to conduct an asset quality review in the third (Q3) and fourth quarter (Q4) of FY16, which resulted in a 70 per cent jump in their gross NPAs between September 2015 and March 2016. 

On April 18, the RBI introduced a rule that mandated banks to disclose the RBI-assessed bad debt numbers, if the divergence between the central bank’s assessment and the bank’s actual reporting was more than 15 per cent. 

Interesting times..