Is profit still a bad word in Indian polity?

JRD Tata once remarked how Indian Government during the 1950s did not like the profit word. It seems not much has changed despite many years of reforms.

Praveen Chakrabarty of IDFC institute points how post announcement of GST rates, Indian government is again warning against anti-profiteering. One reacted similarly to the G0vernment comments and wanted to blog. Thanks to Praveen who does a great job:

 We expect companies to cooperate. We hope we don’t have to use the weapon”. This was the threat issued by Hasmukh Adhia, India’s revenue secretary (“GST: Hasmukh Adhia warns industry against hiking prices arbitrarily”, The Indian Express, 20 May). Adhia was demanding “cooperation” from corporate India on pricing of their goods and services after the implementation of goods and services tax (GST). In other words, he implied that the pricing of goods and services should be in compliance with the government’s expectations. If companies failed to comply, he warned that the government has a weapon to unleash on them—the “anti profiteering” clause. This new “weapon” in the arsenal of the Union government has been designed and launched as part of the GST Bill. The government can now create a new “Authority” which will decide whether businesses have reduced their prices “enough” when there is a reduction in the GST rate of a particular good or service.

Let’s play this out. Today, a ghee dosa at a popular restaurant in New Delhi costs Rs160. The same dosa in the same chain in Chennai costs Rs80. GST rates of ghee are now fixed at 12%, which is a reduction from the current 12.5% tax for ghee in Delhi but an increase from the current 5% in Chennai. But GST rates for services in an air-conditioned restaurant are 18%, down from 22% in both the states.

So, as per the government’s“expectations of cooperation”, this restaurant should now drop its price of ghee dosa in its outlets in Delhi and the quantum of this price decrease should be a precise weighted average of the GST rate reductions of half a percentage point for ghee and four percentage points for service tax. Ostensibly, an officer from the new “Anti Profiteering Authority of India” will now do this calculation and inspect the restaurant in Delhi to check if the price of ghee dosa has indeed been reduced by this amount.

This is the weapon the government has threatened to unleash, if goods and service providers fail to comply. It is a bit unclear if the government also expects the Chennai outlet of the restaurant to match the revised price of gheedosa in the Delhi outlet under the slogan of a “one nation, one ghee dosa, one price”

Other countries also tried this anti=profiteering ahead of their GST:

To be sure, India is not the only country to conjure up an anti-profit legislation. Malaysia tried an anti-profiteering and price control law in 2011, ahead of its GST roll-out. It turned out to be a disastrous move which was counter-productive and finally abandoned. Lest this be misunderstood as some paean for efficiency of free and unfettered markets, I readily admit that India is more prone to price gouging and cartelization than most other developed nations. The fears of Adhia and the GST Council of collusion among businesses to not pass on lower prices to consumers may well be justified. There may certainly be a need to supervise, oversee and regulate such unruly behaviour by corporate India. But why create yet another new government body when India already enacted a Competition Act back in 2002 and created the Competition Commission to regulate precisely such behaviour.

The Competition Commission with a mandate to protect the consumer from industry cartelization has been fully functional for eight years now and has earned a good reputation for itself. Rather than create yet another regulator, the GST law could have merely conferred referral powers to the GST Council to refer suspicious cases of price hoarding to the Competition Commission. It is not hard to imagine how officers of this new “Anti Profit Authority” can raise arbitrary objections to what they deem is a “fair” price of a certain good or service after a GST reduction and threaten to levy penalties.

Chief economic adviser Arvind Subramanian, in a recent lecture, implored Indian industry, experts and commentators to be more forthright in their analysis of policies and not hold back for fear or favour. Indian industry has never had the spine to speak up , economic liberalization or otherwise. The very idea of creating a new government body to monitor prices is retrograde. Commentators and policy analysts need to speak out against this vehemently and ensure India is not saddled with yet another regulatory “authority”.

It is too much to expect our experts to speak out. It is very rare when they question anything on government policy.

If there are being cartels etc it is still fine. But to keep a tab on how private sector is setting prices post GST is going back many years.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Is profit still a bad word in Indian polity?”

  1. Ashok Sundaresan Says:

    Physician, heal thyself. First the Competition Commission should see at what rates several state governments are buying goods. 5 times 10 times over invoicing and sharing the loot among the supplier, ministry and bureaucrat is common place. That is rampant profiteering.

  2. vikramml Says:

    This is exactly why I have no respect for our so-called experts. They should be resigning and/or crying out loud against such policies. Our media is also complicit or incapable as they do not report on this with any depth of economic understanding. The problem is really basic: as a people we do not know what capitalism and democracy are, because these are imports and not developed organically within India over time. Sheeple have no problem if their politicians act like kings handing out favors (just today the headline news is: Modi gifts a bridge to NE. I stopped reading the news right there because the notion of “gift” in this context is unbearably irksome). And they have no clue about socialism vs capitalism so they have no problem with socialistic policies doomed to perpetuate their poverty. They have no understanding of capitalism vs crony capitalism either. They have no understanding of govt/bureaucratic overreach or state control of industry. I had hope in the new generation coz they have better exposure to other countries, but they are nowhere to be found as yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: