Prof Sashi Sivramkrishna in this MC article deconstructs banking.
In order to deconstruct banking, we begin with the term deposit. Do banks take ‘deposits’? No. The word deposit taken from the Roman law depositum implies bailment. In other words, a deposit would mean that the bailor (depositor) transfers physical possession of the property (money) for a period of time and for a specific purpose to the bailee (bank), but retains ownership.
…..
The other side of the bank’s operations — ‘lending’ — is also significant. To lend something implies two essential conditions: that it already exists and that something is actually transferred from someone to someone else or some other entity. In an extraordinary empirical study of actual transactions recorded by a bank when he actually took a loan, Richard Werner found that the bank did not ‘lend’ money. The bank created money ‘ex nihilo’ or out of nothing.
…..
Some heterodox economists such as Werner, therefore, argue that stricter control over direction of credit as well as a decentralised banking sector that is more responsive to the needs of small and medium industries may be required to increase real capital investment and employment opportunities.
The success of economies like Germany, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and more recently, China, can be understood only with an appreciation of the essence of banking, namely, its dominance over the creation of money in a modern economy and the need to exercise appropriate control over it.
More in the piece…